Posts Tagged ‘law’

Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.

Thursday, January 14th, 2010

ww govt1 400 212x300 Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.It seems that every day another one of our freedoms is being taken away, shit on and flushed down the governmental toilet. Today is no different. Only this time theses pencil pushing, limp dick, do-gooder, chumps are striking at the very heart of freedom. There is a plan in place to force Internet Service Providers [ISPs] to censor the Internet for all Australians. They call it a “Clean Feed”.

The reasons behind this are actually good, but just like we’ve seen time and time again, they are taking it too far and at the end of the day only hurting those of us who are doing the right thing. To sum it all up, they want to stop child pornography and protect Australian children who are using the internet. Like I said, good reasons. I have no problems about stopping kiddy porn. In fact I say that anyone found dealing with kiddy porn, raping or abusing children in any way, should have their nuts cut off, cooked and force down their own throats.

The problem lies here. Blocking certain sites will NOT stop this from happening. Most of the kiddy porn is done privately and not part of the public internet. No matter how we try and censor the net, these people will find access to the material some how. Have people forgotten that this problem has been around a lot longer than the internet has. I repeat, blocking the internet will NOT stop the trade.

So what about protecting our children from questionable material. Once again, I’ve got no problem with this. But should we block the internet for everyone, including responsible adults? The answer is a very firm NO! Software is available for every computer that can filter the internet and make it safe for children. This software will actually be a lot more effective as it will be able to block a lot more than what the government plans to.

This is part of being a responsible parent. If you have children and you have a computer that is linked to the internet, you should prevent your children from accessing the internet just the same way as you would not allow them to see an “R” rated movie. If you are not a responsible parent (which seems to be about 80% these days), then this is where the government should step in. Create a law that states that any household where a child is present, must have child-filters on the computers. Any parent found not doing so should then be prosecuted. The responsibility for a child’s safety is with the parent.

So what is it they actually want to block? Well there are a number of web sites, if not all of them, that I personally will never visit. A lot of porn and stuff of “bad taste”. But then you come across other sites like www.tinypic.com. This is a file hosting web site used for sharing video and images. These sort of sites are used to host media files that you then link to on social web sites like MySpace, facebook, forums, blogs, etc. The problem is that as they are an automated process, they have also been used for sharing pedophile paraphernalia. So do we ban these useful sites just because a few people misuse them? Once again the answer is a very firm NO!

And why not? Well where does it stop. As soon as the government has a precedent in place to stop the free flow of information on the net, they can then use this to increase their censorship into other areas. And that is what they are already talking about. No longer is it just about children and their protection, they now want to censor the flow of games, movies and other material that fits into their opinion of what is immoral content.

This needs to be stopped and we are the people to stop it. Take action by visiting www.nocleanfeed.com. There is plenty more information about the issue there and many ways that we can work together to stop this corrosion of freedom. The web site is run by Electronic Frontiers Australia, a non-profit organisation helping to fight for the freedom and rights of Internet users. Sounds like a good thing to me.

nocensorship Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.

twitter Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.facebook Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.linkedin Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.stumbleupon Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.delicious Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.digg Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.technorati Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.myspace Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.friendfeed Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.reddit Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.wordpress Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.bebo Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.aim Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.evernote Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.gmail Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.reader Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.google Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.share save 256 24 Say NO to censorship. Help stop the “Clean Feed”.

Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

There are endless things to complain and wine about CityLink and other toll road companies. And I’m sure many of them are the same around the country and possibly the world.

“Why should we pay tolls when we already pay road tax?”

“We were promissed there would be no tolls, when the road was being built!”

“Wasn’t that road a public road and free to drive on before?”

But I would like to focus on two issues that I haven’t heard mentioned before. I don’t claim to be a lawyer and have limited legal knowledge, but these issues seem to go against what I would believe to be legal.

I became aware of these issues after returning home from a recent trip. I had been on the road for three months and, as you can imagine, all I wanted to do was to get home. I had been driving for a number of hours as I approached Melbourne and as I got passed the Tullamarine airport I realised that the roads had changed quite a lot since the last time I had been on them. Somehow, in the confusion, I found myself on the CityLink tollway. I was irritated but thought, at least I’d be home quicker.

I personally believe that being tolled to drive on roads when we pay road tax, petrol tax, and a number of other taxes that should go towards road upkeep, is wrong. So I protest the best way I can and normally avoid the toll roads completely. On the odd occasion when they just can’t be avoided, I will purchase a Daypass.

On this particular occasion I figured I would call up when I got home and purchase the pass. They allow you three days after the travel time, to purchase a pass. Anyway, five days later and I realised I had forgotten to call them. I jumped on the phone and spoke to one of their customer service people. I was told I could no longer pay for the daypass and would have to wait for an invoice to be issued with an additional “administration” fee.

Several weeks passed and eventually the invoice arrived by mail. At first I didn’t think much of it and put it in my ‘bills to pay’ tray. Then, a few days later, I started thinking about it. How did they get my address? I have never given it to them. When purchasing a daypass over the phone or online or even at one of there touchscreen kiosks, I have never had to give my address or any personal details.

Now, of course I know how they got my address. It’s registered to my license plate. But how did they get access to this information? A normal person like you or me can’t get someone’s personal address just by presenting a license plate number. As far as I’m aware, it is illegal for the government to hand out that kind of information. So why does CityLink, a non-government, commercial entity, have access to our personal information. Isn’t this a breach of privacy?

But it doesn’t stop there…

I returned to the invoice to eventually pay the damn thing and read through it. In big bold type at the bottom of the page was a warning. If this bill wasn’t paid on time Victoria Police would issue me with a fine.

How on Earth had they managed this? Remember CityLink is a non-government, commercial entity. They are just like any other big corporate company run by a CEO and owned by the share holders. How have they got the Victorian Police Force to handle their debt collection? Do they pay Victoria Police for this service, or is it another burden on the tax payers? I’m pretty sure that I couldn’t get the Police to fine any of my late paying clients, as I’m sure you couldn’t either. Although I think we’d all agree that it’d be nice to have them backing us up.

Like I said earlier, I have little legal knowledge but I’d love to see some comments from anyone that knows how CityLink is able to do this. I have sent an email to CityLink to ask them directly about these issues. If they respond I will write a follow up post as well as endeavour to find out more information.

twitter Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?facebook Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?linkedin Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?stumbleupon Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?delicious Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?digg Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?technorati Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?myspace Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?friendfeed Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?reddit Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?wordpress Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?bebo Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?aim Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?evernote Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?gmail Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?reader Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?google Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?share save 256 24 Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?