Posts Tagged ‘observations’

A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.

Monday, October 19th, 2009

VegiMeat 450x378 A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.

There are many reasons for becoming a vegetarian or a vegan, all you have to do is a quick search of the internet and you’ll see. But at the end of the day, the reasons can usually be whittled away to just one; morality. Some people just don’t like the idea of animals getting killed. So they take the so-called moral high ground and make bold statements like “meat is murder” and the such.

Firstly for those of you who are unaware of the difference, a vegan has a diet consisting of no animal product at all, while a vegetarian includes dairy such as milk and eggs along with all of their fruit, vegetables, nuts and grains. Some vegetarians really stretch the term by allowing themselves to eat fish or chicken too and only avoid red meat.

So why the prejudice? Why do some think it’s ok to eat fish but not cow? Well, simply put, in most cases, you’ll find that the further away from ourselves the less of a problem we have with killing it. Cow’s, sheep and especially pigs are fairly close to us on the evolutionary chart. We all have four limbs, two eyes, a face, hair (well I used to at least…) and are warm blooded. A chicken is a little stranger with it’s beak and feathers and strange bone structure, while a fish is a long way from being like us. But for now, we’ll pretend that vegetarians don’t eat meat.

But what about vegetables? They too are giving up their life for us to eat. How is this any different? If you are to take the moral high ground and state that “meat is murder” then isn’t killing a vegetable also murder? Why must only life that resembles our own, be of high enough value to protect? There is only one word to describe a vegetarian or vegan who is such for the sole purpose of protecting life and that is a hypocrite.

Regardless of what propaganda is being pushed on us from these people, humans are not vegetarian by nature, nor are we carnivores. We are omnivores. For those who don’t know, this means we need food from both plant and animal sources. I’m not a nutritionist so am not going to give advice on such, but have you ever seen a nutritional table that did not include both plant and animal products?

Before I get inundated by angry vegetarians and vegans, allow me to state that I am an animal lover but I also love plants and trees just as much. If we are to take the moral high ground and say no more killing, then all that is left are the parts of plants that are freely given without the demise of the plant itself; fruit, nuts, seeds and grains. Basically to become a fruitarian. Is there enough nutritional value in these alone? I don’t know. I do know that dinner would be boring if this was all that we could eat.

twitter A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.facebook A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.linkedin A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.stumbleupon A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.delicious A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.digg A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.technorati A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.myspace A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.friendfeed A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.reddit A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.wordpress A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.bebo A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.aim A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.evernote A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.buzz A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.gmail A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.reader A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.google A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.share save 256 24 A look at the hypocrisy of vegetarians and their misguided beliefs.

The hard truth about sustainability. There’s no room for profit in our future.

Monday, October 12th, 2009

Discarded Earth 300x263 The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.

So the other day, a friend of mine got asked to consult on a project for a sustainability centre. He invited me along to contribute, knowing that I’ve expressed some good ideas on the subject in the past. The meeting went well and I got to chase and catch some chickens, which is always a fun thing to do. Afterwards my brain got ticking away on some old issues that I haven’t really thought about in quite a while.

I say ‘old’ issues, because I was thinking about this stuff many years ago, even though it only now seems to be seeping into the general consciousness of society. The good thing about re-thinking old thoughts is that I can now look at them with a whole wealth of new information and understanding that I have learned since the last time I pondered them. Funny how I’ve come up with exactly the same answer as I did then. Basically, in a nut shell, we’re screwed!

As I was pondering the concept of sustainability, it hit me that while we are living in a society that worships the “profit” god, there can be no sustainability. I can already hear peoples protests out there: “But we can be sustainable and make a profit, we can recycle our water and paper and lessen our carbon output” Well that is going to help, but it’s not going to solve the problem.

Let’s take a quick look at what “sustainability” really is. At its basic level it means to conserve an ecological balance by avoiding depletion of natural resources. To take it a little bit further it means using energy that is renewable. Like wind or solar rather than fossil fuels that have a finite supply. It also means using raw materials in the things we make that are not only replaceable but also can be recycled or broken back down into base elements once discarded; like biodegradable substances.

Trees are a great example. They can be grown fairly easily and quickly and when the products they are made of, such as paper, are discarded, they break down fairly easily without any negative side effects on the environment. Unless, of course, they have been treated with something nasty, which usually they have.

By now, I’m sure that most of you are already aware of this stuff and quite possibly doing something about it like recycling your waste, conserving water and where possible using that, so called, “green energy” that all the energy suppliers like to tell us about and charge us more for. But I’m not going to go down that path. At least not today.

Ok so now that the basics are out of the way, in order for me to explain how profit, on a financial level, is working against sustainability, I first must break it all down into the very core elements. In its simplest form, what we are talking about is energy. Energy that is used to create fuels, products and stuff in general and the energy that is left over from the creation processes as well as the discarded creations at the end of the cycle.

Money is nothing more than an exchange of energy on a level that we can relate to. For example, if I were to create a painting (I wouldn’t because I can’t draw, but go with me here) it has taken up my energy to make. I give that energy a monetary value based on the time and effort put into the creation and then sell it for that price. But I also have to take into account the energy put into the raw materials that I used. Even though I didn’t create them myself, I transfered energy to the creators of the canvas and paints by paying them with money that represented the energy they had spent and so on…

I think that money is a great invention and a perfect way to represent the energy we spend working on things. However, somewhere along the line greed and corruption got into the equation (I’m guessing probably from its inception). As soon as someone decided to give their energy a monetary value plus a little bit more for profit, we were all doomed. And to understand that you need to understand one of the basic laws of physics. The law of conservation of energy which states that energy can change forms but not be created or destroyed.

The simplest way to explain this is by turning on a light switch. The electricity, surges through the element in the globe transforming into heat. Some of the heat radiates out while some of it transforms into light and so on. The energy keeps getting transformed into other forms of energy, but never disappears, although once past the light and heat stage, it is generally so watered down by other energies in the atmosphere that we are unaware of where, exactly it goes.

So with this ‘law’ in mind, if you are making a profit, which is actually a profit of energy, then where did it come from? Remember that energy can not be created or destroyed. If you have made a profit, does this then mean that you have taken more than your fair share of energy? At who’s expense? If you have extra it must then mean that someone or something has less.

I’m sure by now, some of you are catching on, but let’s continue. You may think that if someone is paying extra for something to cover the energy used plus the profit, then that is their choice and the profit is justified. That person, the “end user” is choosing to pay the price asked for and could always say no. But in today’s western society it is rarely the end user that pays for the profit. In fact the end user is usually getting the product at a heavily discounted price, much below cost price.

I’m sure you’re wondering how that is even possible. Allow me to continue. Basically there are two ways to generate a profit. The first, and simplest way, is to raise the price to the end user. But the end user these days is just as greedy as the suppliers and the manufacturers, and demands the pricing be kept low. This way the end user can stay in the ‘profit zone’ too. The other way to generate profit is to cut costs. It sounds simple enough and far less insidious than it actually is.

A product takes a certain amount of energy to create. No matter what!

A little equation I learned a long time ago is that to make something you can have any two out of three elements; TIME, QUALITY or MONEY (energy, in keeping with this article.) You can have any two but it is not possible to have all three. For example, you can make something quickly and at a high quality but it will take a lot of money or energy. Or you could make something cheap and maintain the high quality but it’s going to take a lot more time. I’ve never come across a situation that broke this rule.

Cutting costs on paper is a way to break this rule; in reality it doesn’t work that way. If, for instance, a company decides to fire some of its workforce to “cut costs” it then expects the remaining employees to pick up the slack and work harder for the same amount of money. Basically they have pushed the cost of production onto someone else and off their books. The employees that now have to work harder and longer, now put more of their own energy into creating the same product with no extra compensation.

To put it in its simplest terms, the company has stolen energy from its employees to create an excess of energy, or profit, for itself. But it doesn’t stop there.

If a company takes something from the Earth in the form of raw materials, this too is recognised as energy. To be sustainable the company involved needs to replace this energy. If for instance the company takes trees to make a product out of wood, then the company needs to replace the trees taken in order to have a zero impact. Of course a tree takes time to grow which requires an enormous amount of energy, so the company actually needs to plant a great deal more trees than it actually cuts down to maintain balance and be fully sustainable. If a company is using other raw materials it can get a lot more complicated. Some raw elements such as fossil fuels can take millions of years to create and require levels of energy beyond our comprehension.

So, in the pursuit of profit, many companies take the raw materials from the Earth without making the repayment; they steal it! So now, not only are the employees paying for the product to be made but so too is the Earth, our home. The corporate term for this process is called “Cost Externalising” and it is a socio-economic practice that is happening the world over.

Society and indeed our very planet cannot continue indefinitely, under the strains applied by the pursuit of profit. It’s time we started taking responsibility for our actions. Not only should we be paying the true price for things we must also repay an enormous debt that we and our ancestors have accumulated over the last several hundred years. When the planetary debt collectors come knocking, they wont mess around. We could very possibly end up paying the ultimate price. Complete extinction.

twitter The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.facebook The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.linkedin The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.stumbleupon The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.delicious The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.digg The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.technorati The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.myspace The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.friendfeed The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.reddit The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.wordpress The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.bebo The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.aim The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.evernote The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.buzz The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.gmail The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.reader The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.google The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.share save 256 24 The hard truth about sustainability. Theres no room for profit in our future.

The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?

Monday, September 28th, 2009

Dollar Greed Barcode 450x337 The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?Let me start by telling you exactly how I feel about big supermarkets and department stores like Coles, Safeway, Target and K-mart to name a few local chains here in Australia. When you shop at one of these stores, you are doing nothing less than spitting in the face of freedom. And don’t think that I am over reacting. For years these companies have been using their warmonger tactics to take over and destroy competition from smaller, independent retailers. And in the name of convenience we have allowed this to happen.

There is another term that can be used to describe those who look for the convenient option regardless of the outcome. Lazy! And if you’re sitting there thinking “but what is wrong with supermarkets and department stores?” you can throw in the terms ignorant and naive too.

Since the birth of these abominations, it has been their one goal to take over and be the one source of all products, no matter what the cost to us, our culture, society and environment. The first stage was to establish themselves as a place of connivence, where you could go to get many products under the one roof, instead of having to walk up and down a street of individual shops. They succeeded. And for someone like me who hates shopping, they are convenient.

The next stage was to eradicate all competition by using unfair trade tactics and providing products direct to the public, at prices much lower than the competition could possibly provide. In many cases, they sell their products even cheaper than what the competitions wholesale price is. Once again they have succeeded. Unless you live in a country town or a suburb that has resisted the propaganda (and there are a few remaining), independent grocery stores, toy shops, fruit & vegetable shops, bottle shops, bakeries, butchers and many more, are becoming casualties of the war and having to close up shop. They just can’t compete.

This is about where they are up to in their world domination plans. The next stage, which they are beginning to implement in certain areas now, is to start jacking up the prices to increase profit margins. They can do it because there are no longer any threats of competition, other than different chains of supermarket and department stores who are up to the same tricks. But they don’t want to totally alienate us, the customers, so they’ll do it slowly at first so you don’t realise. They also do it along with perceived bonuses so that you don’t mind paying extra. Let me give you an example.

Say for instance that baby spinach leaves were being sold for $4.50 per Kilogram. Yes, I know that’s a lot of spinach leaves, but I must stay strong cause I loves me Olive Oyl… Ok enough of the bad jokes…

I doubt there are many people who actually buy baby spinach leaves by the kilo. You probably get more like 100 to 200 grams at a time and only spend fifty cents to a dollar. The supermarketing geniuses took note of what the average amount being purchased was and decided to offer the spinach leaves in pre-package amounts of 200 grams instead of the loose leaf we’ve all been used to. They then sell the pre-packaged 200 grams of baby spinach for the same price you could get a kilo of the loose leaf. We as consumers are so used to seeing the price of $4.50 a kilo but then associating that price with the amount that we actually purchase of only 200 grams, suddenly seeing the 200 grams now priced at $4.50 doesn’t raise any alarm bells.

Their deception doesn’t stop there. The now pre-packaged spinach leaves are wrapped in a glossy plastic which gives the green leaves a sense of being more vibrant, lush and fresh than the loose leaves. They are doing a similar thing with computer monitors these days too. They use a glossy screen to give the image a much richer and more vibrant look than the traditional matte finishes, even though the image being sent to the monitor is exactly the same.

For one last push to get you to spend more on the spinach for less of it, they now put the nice new glossy pack up at the natural eye level under bright lights that, again add to the freshness look. The loose leaf spinach is usually kept in a cardboard box on the bottom shelf away from the lights so that it doesn’t look as appealing. By this stage, most people have made the transition to paying five times the amount they previously were without even realising it.

Of course the actual prices are going to vary from place to place and shop to shop. I only used these prices as an example of what is going on. Which brings me to a side note… Did you know that if you went to ten supermarkets on any given day and looked up the price of the same items in each, the price would vary depending on the area. The supermarkets that still have competition they are trying to eliminate, keep their prices low while the ones where the competition has been slaughtered, are able to increase the prices for greater profit. They of course rely on your habits of convenience, in a hope that you don’t venture too far from your local stores and become aware of the price variances.

The next thing they’ll do, is get you to pay for things that have previously been considered part of normal running costs and built into the pricing of their products. For instance shopping bags and shopping trollies.

Currently I’m unaware of any shop that actually charges for the use of their trollies (other than the airports). However, have you noticed them preparing you for the idea? Almost all supermarkets and department stores in the Melbourne area, make you put a one or two dollar coin into the trolley to release it from the trolley bay. You then get the coin returned when you return the trolley. This is one of many ways these shops work to externalise their costs. Instead of employing someone to collect trollies from the car park, they now motivate you to do the job for them and for nothing. I would bet that this is a precursor to them actually charging for the use of these trollies. Of course this won’t happen until we have all been trained to return the trollies ourselves and do it naturally.

Then there is the debate of plastic bags. A number of supermarkets and department stores around the country are conducting trials, charging for standard plastic carrier bags. Now I don’t know who started this one, but the supermarkets and department stores have certainly taken the opportunity to profit. I have a feeling that it began  when the environmentalists kicked up a stink about the adverse effects, plastic bags have on the environment. I’m not going to get into the environmental debate here, but instead of doing the right thing and swapping over to biodegradable bags and being done with the issue, the supermarkets and department stores came up with the ingenious idea to charge the customer to have a plastic bag instead. Not much, just the small fee of around ten cents per bag.

Ten cents… Not much at all really, until you realise that 500 billion to a trillion plastic bags are used each year worldwide. I had a look around and found that I could order biodegradable bags for as low as two cents a bag. I’m sure when the supermarkets and department stores place orders in the millions, they can get them a hell of a lot cheaper than that. If they all started charging their ten cents a bag, that would put at least $40 billion in their pockets. The supermarkets and department stores claim that this is to deter us from using plastic bags so that the environment benefits. Not a bad profit for helping the environment.

If they truly cared about the environment, there is a lot more they could do to solve the problem. It is at this point that I must applaud one department store that seems to be doing the right thing on this issue. Bunnings, a giant hardware store (mind you, this is a hardware store that destroyed all the independent competition in the country, so I can’t applaud them too much), has stopped using plastic bags altogether. Instead they offer cardboard boxes for free. Basically all of the boxes that their stock arrives in, is placed in a holding cage near the exit for customers to use. Not once have I seen boxes available as an option in the majority of other supermarkets and department stores.

So you see, supermarkets and department stores have destroyed all competition and in doing so, have taken our freedom to choose where to shop. In the past if we did not like the service we were getting or the prices being charged or even the smell of the cashier, we could choose not to spend our money at that store and find another one with service, prices or the odor of a cashier that was more to our individual liking. That freedom is gone. We can choose not to shop at theses supermarkets or department stores, but for many items, they are just no longer available anywhere else. Without the freedom to go elsewhere, we no longer have the power to protest the things we don’t like. If we get bad service at one supermarket chain our only choice is to choose a different chain with equally bad service.

I’m not entirely sure what the solution is and fear that these Goliath’s have established too strong a foothold within our communities to be removed. I do however do my bit as an army of one. If a store is charging for bags, I’ll fill a trolley up with items go to the check out, let them scan all of the items and then when they ask if I want to purchase bags I’ll look disgusted at the idea and tell them if they charge me for the bags they’ll loose the sale. Occasionally they have given me the bags to avoid a “scene”. When the don’t relent, I walk away and leave them to clean up and put all the products back. This has cost the store a lot more than the three or four bags would have.

Whenever I need a trolley, I walk up to the help desk and tell them that I need a trolley to do my shopping but don’t have any coins. They then use a special tool to release the trolley for me. No coins required. I’ll then leave the trolley where I park so that a trolley retrievalist can have the job of collecting it.

If there is a choice of packeted vegetables as well as loose ones, I’ll pick the packeted version and then take them out of the packet. This way I get it at the loose price. I’ll leave the packet on the shelf in plain sight, so they know they have been beaten at their own game.

I know these things can appear petty and pointless, but what else can be done? Of course, wherever it is still possible, make the choice to shop at the last remaining independent stores. I am lucky in that there are still have a couple of independent butchers nearby. By shopping there, not only am I fighting against the supermarkets, but the real butcher has far greater range at much better quality. By putting in that extra little bit of effort to go to a separate shop, both myself and the community are benefitting. Imagine if we all acted this way. The supermarkets and department stores would bow to our pressure when it is costing them their precious profits. And that’s the way it should be.

Don’t get me wrong. I believe there is a place in our communities for supermarkets and department stores. They help to serve the masses in ways that small independent shops would become overwhelmed. I just wish they’d play nice, and understand that there is also a place in our communities for the small independent stores. There is plenty of room in the marketplace for both to operate. It is greed that has driven the supermarkets and department stores to crush the independent retail outlets. I’d love to hear any suggestions and solutions you may have, or ways in which you are protesting. Just leave a them in a comment below.

twitter The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?facebook The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?linkedin The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?stumbleupon The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?delicious The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?digg The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?technorati The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?myspace The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?friendfeed The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?reddit The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?wordpress The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?bebo The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?aim The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?evernote The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?buzz The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?gmail The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?reader The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?google The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?share save 256 24 The truth about supermarkets and department stores and their plans for world domination?

The meaning of life… I have found the answer to true enlightenment.

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

QuestionMark 241x300 The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.These days, there are a great many people out there who claim to have the answers we seek, to some of the biggest questions we all ask. Why are we here? Is there life out there in space? Is there a God? Does a red car really go faster? Religious leaders, scientists, new age spiritualists, all claim to have the answers to lead us into enlightenment. But do they really?

There is a saying that I use – “If you think you have found the answer, you’ve just given up looking!” In the past, I have claimed that I have found the meaning of life, something that most of us would love to know. Many people think that if you know the meaning of life, then you have the answers to everything. I wish this were so. The meaning of life, however, is just one tiny, little thing in a great, big, eternal universe. There is still infinite knowledge to learn.

I wish I had all the answers to all the questions so that I could share them with you, but I don’t. I doubt that I ever will, or even if anyone ever will. If we were to have infinite knowledge, would we not be God’s. I for one, am not a God, other than my own. I am merely a human that has been deposited on this planet we call home. Just like all other humans, I have my fair share of faults and probably misguided beliefs.  For instance I still believe that one day someone will invent a way to lose weight overnight without any effort.  Now tell me that’s not a misguided belief.  I am only telling you this so that you realise that these pages are filled with my opinions, my theories, my ideas and my beliefs. Therefore they are subject to any faults that I may have.

What I am trying to say is that they are not, set in stone, fact. Most of my beliefs are based on my observations and understanding of the world around me. Where I venture into the realms that currently are beyond what can be known, I try to analyse the information available, with logic and reason to come to my own conclusions. What I believe, is what seems right to me. However, I always open to the possibility that someone may come along and say “well did you think of it from this point of view” and completely change my ideas and ultimately my beliefs.

If I was to tell you my beliefs, would they then become your beliefs too? As much as my ego likes that idea, I really hope that they wouldn’t. If you see anything here and think ‘Hey, he’s gotta point’ or ‘You know he may just be right’, don’t just accept it as gospel because it is a logical and plausible point of view. Look into it, mount your own investigation on the subject, expand on my ideas and then share them, so that we all may grow. The more we question things and examine them, the deeper our understanding will become.

In an interview I did with a journalist about a screenplay I had written, I said ‘A great story isn’t just written. It is evolved!’. This applies to everything, not just works of fiction. Philosophy, knowledge, understanding, science, hot dogs… If they are great then they have been evolved from a simple beginning. Nothing just happens to be great. Ideas are exactly the same, they need to be evolved.

So what of these people that really do claim to be enlightened beings that have the answers?

A truly enlightened person would not have the arrogance to claim they know the answers. In an infinite universe, there is infinite knowledge. Human beings are just an infinitesimally small creature within it, that couldn’t even begin to scratch the surface of understanding all that there is. People may have ideas, theories or beliefs about what the answers to those big questions are, but the do not know as an absolute fact. They couldn’t possibly. Of course this doesn’t mean that their ideas are wrong.

So what then, do I believe the meaning of life is?

Well I believe it is simple. Anyone who says that it is something only few people are gifted enough to understand, are just trying to control you. Either that, or they are brainwashed and just repeating what their controller has said to them.  And now the moment of truth. The answer to the most commonly asked question by all humans.  What is the meaning of life?

To learn, experience and create!

What the…! The meaning of life can be summed up in five words? Yes, I believe it is that simple. People usually think that the more complicated something is, the more likely it is to be correct. The fact is that most of the things that seem to be complicated, really aren’t, it is just a matter of how you look at it.

Now if only we could learn to get along, so that we could experience each others kindness, rather than create weapons to destroy ourselves…

twitter The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.facebook The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.linkedin The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.stumbleupon The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.delicious The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.digg The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.technorati The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.myspace The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.friendfeed The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.reddit The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.wordpress The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.bebo The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.aim The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.evernote The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.buzz The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.gmail The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.reader The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.google The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.share save 256 24 The meaning of life... I have found the answer to true enlightenment.

Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.

Tuesday, September 15th, 2009

two lovers kissing 217x300 Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.After attacking the social network scene yesterday, I thought it may be a good time to talk about relationships between people. Now I’m not just talking about romantic relationships, but all kinds. The dictionary describes a relationship as the way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.

I believe a relationship can be as simple as striking up a conversation with someone in an elevator to pass the minute or two before the doors open, or as complex as a forty year long marriage. Of course not all relationships are meant to be long lasting, and that’s when they break down.

Each and every connection between people serves a purpose to both parties.  No one hangs out with someone just because. When there is no longer a reason to stay connected, each person continues on their own way and the relationship is over. It’s easy to understand and accept this with a short term relationship such as the elevator scenario but what about a longer lasting relationship such as a friendship.

Well it’s just as simple really. If you and your best friend, for example, are both getting something from the relationship, weather it be someone to confide in, or someone to go out and have fun with, or whatever the reason is that you are friends, then the relationship will last and thrive. But what if life takes you down one path and your friend down another? As you both have different experiences and learn and grow, you may find that you are becoming different people (of course you’ll probably think that it’s your friend who has changed and not you…) This is what is called growing apart and it can happen with any relationship, long or short.

I think a great many people feel that to grow apart is a bad thing, when actually it’s just a natural part of life. It really is almost impossibly difficult for two people to grow as human beings at the same rate and in the same way. If, for instance, you have a lot of life experiences, yet your friend rarely does anything new or different, you may find yourself feeling that you have outgrown him or her or vise-versa. Al of this is a natural part of having relationships.

The problems begin when you go against the natural way of things and try to force a relationship when it has actually reached it’s conclusion. For some reason people feel the need to hang on to things. Maybe it’s out of a fear of change or some other deep psychological reason. Married people, for instance, quite often try and force the relationship to stay together because of a sense of commitment. Let’s face it, they promised they would stay together when they got married.

Trying to force a relationship, when it’s not meant to be, can put an enormous strain on all involved. Things will start off small, maybe you start finding something that your friend does irritating, or you realise that there’s something you never really liked about your partner. Things can only escalate from there and it wont be long before everything about them starts to annoy you. Once this happen the relationship is in a very dangerous place. It can become volatile and explode at any minute. If this happens it usually irreparable.

And yet some people still try to force it to work. No amount of will power can make a relationship work once the reason for the relationship no longer exists. The relationship is over. If you still try and persist, the universe will eventually kick in to gear and throw something at you to guarantee separation. This is never usually a good thing and can come in many forms. Health issues, accidents, or any number of other so called random acts.

The key to having good relationships is to be able to recognise early on, the reason for the relationship. Why are you friends? Why are you lovers? What draws you to that person? Why are you connected? Answer this basic question and you can recognise when the relationship is coming to an end. Of course a relationship can grow and evolve too. When one reason for having a relationship is coming to an end, you may find another reason or you may be so connected that you have a number of reasons all at once. If two people can grow together and maintain a healthy relationship, it can be a wonderful thing.

I know with my relationships, I can usually recognise when they are coming to an end. When this happens I’ll begin to pull away from the other person. I’ve found this to be the least destructive way of ending a relationship. Basically just drifting apart and never trying to force it. A number of people and friends I have done this with, have actually returned to my life at a later date and a new relationship is developed, with a new reason for being. Of course this probably isn’t going to happen if you end the relationship on bad terms. If that’s the case, there’s a good chance you’ll end up hating each other and never reconcile.

In fact some of my closest friends today are friends I allowed to drift away in the past, now that we have reconnected, our relationships are deeper and stronger than ever. It’s amazing how ending a relationship on good terms can come back to reward you in the future.

twitter Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.facebook Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.linkedin Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.stumbleupon Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.delicious Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.digg Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.technorati Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.myspace Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.friendfeed Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.reddit Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.wordpress Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.bebo Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.aim Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.evernote Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.buzz Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.gmail Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.reader Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.google Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.share save 256 24 Friends for a day or navigating the end of a relationship.

The EVIL within the Victorian Police Force

Thursday, September 10th, 2009

Victorian Police Logo The EVIL within the Victorian Police Force

I’m sure there are many images that go through your mind when I say I have uncovered an evil within the Victorian Police Force. Brutality, corruption, speeding fines… But what if I told you I had uncovered a real evil within the force. One that’s been sitting there in plain sight for all to see since 1947. They say the best place to hide something is right in front of your face. Well that’s exactly what the police force have done with their logo. The five pointed star, sitting on the wreath wearing the crown, with a cross in the middle. Can you see it yet?

Let’s take a look at the star for a moment. The more common name for a five pointed star is a pentagram, which comes from the Greek word pentagrammon, which, roughly translated, means “five-lined” or “five lines”. The pentagram has a long history with symbology that can be traced back as far as 3000BC to Mesopotamian writings where it was used as pictograms meaning corner or angle or nook among other similar things.

To the Babylonian’s, the edges of the pentagram possibly related to the directions forward, back, left, right, and above, which had an astrological meaning, representing the five planets Jupiter, Mercury, Mars and Saturn, and Venus as Ishtar, the Queen of Heaven above.

Later The Pythagoreans believed there was a mathematical perfection to the pentagram and used the five vertices to represent the five old world elements, earth, water, air, fire and the divine.

It wasn’t, however, until the Europeans got hold of the pentagram that it became a magical symbol. They kept the attributes of the five elements that the Pythagoreans had used, but also developed a belief around the orientation of the star. With a single point upwards it depicted spirit presiding over the four elements of matter, and was essentially good. However, whenever the symbol appeared the other way up, it became evil.

Alphonse Louis, who, literally wrote the book on magic in the 1800’s, claimed a reversed pentagram, with two points projecting upwards, “is a symbol of evil and attracts sinister forces because it overturns the proper order of things and demonstrates the triumph of matter over spirit.”

The pentagram has since gone on to be incorporated into a great many other cultures and religions including Taoism, Mormonism, Judaism, Christianity, Neopaganism and Satanism. If you believe that symbols can have power, then the pentagram is a very powerful one indeed. Today, many people commonly recognise it as an occult symbol with both positive and negative connotations.

I can’t believe that such a prolific symbol would be used as a logo, without knowledge of its history or representation. Does this then mean that the Victorian Police are well aware that their symbol is that of evil? Or are they blissfully oblivious of the image they are portraying. If symbolism really does have power, then this could explain a lot about the negative perception we have of our police today. Maybe all they need to do to gain a better image is to turn the pentagram upwards and we would respect them a little more.

However, I can’t help but ponder the comment “overturns the proper order of things” and think of how that relates to the police in todays society… But that’s a thought  for another day…

twitter The EVIL within the Victorian Police Forcefacebook The EVIL within the Victorian Police Forcelinkedin The EVIL within the Victorian Police Forcestumbleupon The EVIL within the Victorian Police Forcedelicious The EVIL within the Victorian Police Forcedigg The EVIL within the Victorian Police Forcetechnorati The EVIL within the Victorian Police Forcemyspace The EVIL within the Victorian Police Forcefriendfeed The EVIL within the Victorian Police Forcereddit The EVIL within the Victorian Police Forcewordpress The EVIL within the Victorian Police Forcebebo The EVIL within the Victorian Police Forceaim The EVIL within the Victorian Police Forceevernote The EVIL within the Victorian Police Forcebuzz The EVIL within the Victorian Police Forcegmail The EVIL within the Victorian Police Forcereader The EVIL within the Victorian Police Forcegoogle The EVIL within the Victorian Police Forceshare save 256 24 The EVIL within the Victorian Police Force

Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

There are endless things to complain and wine about CityLink and other toll road companies. And I’m sure many of them are the same around the country and possibly the world.

“Why should we pay tolls when we already pay road tax?”

“We were promissed there would be no tolls, when the road was being built!”

“Wasn’t that road a public road and free to drive on before?”

But I would like to focus on two issues that I haven’t heard mentioned before. I don’t claim to be a lawyer and have limited legal knowledge, but these issues seem to go against what I would believe to be legal.

I became aware of these issues after returning home from a recent trip. I had been on the road for three months and, as you can imagine, all I wanted to do was to get home. I had been driving for a number of hours as I approached Melbourne and as I got passed the Tullamarine airport I realised that the roads had changed quite a lot since the last time I had been on them. Somehow, in the confusion, I found myself on the CityLink tollway. I was irritated but thought, at least I’d be home quicker.

I personally believe that being tolled to drive on roads when we pay road tax, petrol tax, and a number of other taxes that should go towards road upkeep, is wrong. So I protest the best way I can and normally avoid the toll roads completely. On the odd occasion when they just can’t be avoided, I will purchase a Daypass.

On this particular occasion I figured I would call up when I got home and purchase the pass. They allow you three days after the travel time, to purchase a pass. Anyway, five days later and I realised I had forgotten to call them. I jumped on the phone and spoke to one of their customer service people. I was told I could no longer pay for the daypass and would have to wait for an invoice to be issued with an additional “administration” fee.

Several weeks passed and eventually the invoice arrived by mail. At first I didn’t think much of it and put it in my ‘bills to pay’ tray. Then, a few days later, I started thinking about it. How did they get my address? I have never given it to them. When purchasing a daypass over the phone or online or even at one of there touchscreen kiosks, I have never had to give my address or any personal details.

Now, of course I know how they got my address. It’s registered to my license plate. But how did they get access to this information? A normal person like you or me can’t get someone’s personal address just by presenting a license plate number. As far as I’m aware, it is illegal for the government to hand out that kind of information. So why does CityLink, a non-government, commercial entity, have access to our personal information. Isn’t this a breach of privacy?

But it doesn’t stop there…

I returned to the invoice to eventually pay the damn thing and read through it. In big bold type at the bottom of the page was a warning. If this bill wasn’t paid on time Victoria Police would issue me with a fine.

How on Earth had they managed this? Remember CityLink is a non-government, commercial entity. They are just like any other big corporate company run by a CEO and owned by the share holders. How have they got the Victorian Police Force to handle their debt collection? Do they pay Victoria Police for this service, or is it another burden on the tax payers? I’m pretty sure that I couldn’t get the Police to fine any of my late paying clients, as I’m sure you couldn’t either. Although I think we’d all agree that it’d be nice to have them backing us up.

Like I said earlier, I have little legal knowledge but I’d love to see some comments from anyone that knows how CityLink is able to do this. I have sent an email to CityLink to ask them directly about these issues. If they respond I will write a follow up post as well as endeavour to find out more information.

twitter Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?facebook Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?linkedin Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?stumbleupon Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?delicious Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?digg Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?technorati Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?myspace Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?friendfeed Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?reddit Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?wordpress Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?bebo Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?aim Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?evernote Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?buzz Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?gmail Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?reader Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?google Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?share save 256 24 Is CityLink conducting illegal operations?

Have we forgotten how to listen?

Saturday, September 5th, 2009

People, as a whole, (and I know I’m over-generalising here) are very good at talking. We talk about anything and everything. The weather, our favorite sports and teams, how we had a good day or (more often) a bad one, and a great many other subjects. Some people keep their talking to light subjects with little meaning while others, like myself, plunge into the depths of knowledge and reason and talk about the meaning of life and how it could be better and other equally brain melting subjects, also with little meaning.

As I sit and ponder these things, I wonder, not about how meaningful the topics of conversation are, but more of who the hell is listening to all these things being said. You see for all our ability to talk and communicate and share, it seems very few of us actually have the ability to listen to other people. I wonder if it has always been this way or is it something that has progressively worsened as we are more and more ferociously, bombarded with more and more voices from every possible angle.

We can’t even go for a drive in the country without the ever-present screaming voices of billboard advertisements and road signs. Is it our attempt to shut these voices out that have lead to us shutting out the voices of those whom we should actually want to hear. Our families, our friends, those trying to help us or those offering something that we actually want.

Maybe we should all just shut the hell up for a while and allow one voice in at a time. One that we can really focus on and listen to. A voice where we actually hear every word. We may be surprised at what we all can learn from our own silence.

twitter Have we forgotten how to listen?facebook Have we forgotten how to listen?linkedin Have we forgotten how to listen?stumbleupon Have we forgotten how to listen?delicious Have we forgotten how to listen?digg Have we forgotten how to listen?technorati Have we forgotten how to listen?myspace Have we forgotten how to listen?friendfeed Have we forgotten how to listen?reddit Have we forgotten how to listen?wordpress Have we forgotten how to listen?bebo Have we forgotten how to listen?aim Have we forgotten how to listen?evernote Have we forgotten how to listen?buzz Have we forgotten how to listen?gmail Have we forgotten how to listen?reader Have we forgotten how to listen?google Have we forgotten how to listen?share save 256 24 Have we forgotten how to listen?